Free Essays on A Retelling Of Noahs Ark

A Retelling of Noah’s Ark Timothy Findley’s Not Wanted on the Voyage is an innovative retelling of the scriptural story of Noah and his better half and their excursion on the ark. He effectively makes a farce, a hilarious type of social critique and artistic analysis where one work mimics another, by taking the antiquated story of Noah’s ark and familiarizing the peruser with what occurred in the middle of the lines (www.dictionary.reference.com). He builds a world that offers numerous captivating prospects to the acknowledged story that it could be said make many provocative thoughts and articulations of how the world is and truly was. The book is separated into four sections. Book One, the appearance and passing of the novel’s God, Book Two subtleties the structure of the ark, Book Three the flood-related preliminaries, and Book Four the finish of the novel. Findley effectively builds up his satire of Noah’s Ark through components of embellishment, stun, and criticize. In the novel, authority is exceptionally overstated with Noah’s tyrant, various leveled perspective on the world (Bailey 145). Noah’s serious ways are practiced enormously with his treatment of ladies. As indicated by Noah ladies exist to serve the requirements of God just as himself and his children (Bailey 132). Mrs Noyes, Hannah and Mottyl may have feelings and wants of their own however they should be subjected to the authority of their spouses, fathers and darlings. Noah exhibits his evil treatment of ladies when he murders Japeth’s sibling who is brought into the world a primate kid, in spite of Mrs. Noyes’ requests to allow the child to live. Noah treats his better half with considerably more deceitfulness when he concludes that his significant other will live beneath the ark and she must choose the option to go. Noah is freezing hearted and will treat his own better half appallingly as long as his socialized fatherly chain of importance is all toge ther. Unmistakably, Noah’s legitimate ways are exhibited through his dreadful treatment of his better half. Noah’s energy for power is als... Free Essays on A Retelling Of Noah's Ark Free Essays on A Retelling Of Noah's Ark A Retelling of Noah’s Ark Timothy Findley’s Not Wanted on the Voyage is an imaginative retelling of the scriptural story of Noah and his better half and their excursion on the ark. He effectively makes a spoof, a comical type of social critique and scholarly analysis where one work emulates another, by taking the old story of Noah’s ark and familiarizing the peruser with what occurred in the middle of the lines (www.dictionary.reference.com). He develops a world that offers numerous captivating prospects to the acknowledged story that it might be said make many intriguing thoughts and proclamations of how the world is and truly was. The book is isolated into four sections. Book One, the appearance and passing of the novel’s God, Book Two subtleties the structure of the ark, Book Three the flood-related preliminaries, and Book Four the finish of the novel. Findley effectively builds up his farce of Noah’s Ark through components of embellishment, stun, and scorn. In the novel, authority is profoundly misrepresented with Noah’s tyrant, various leveled perspective on the world (Bailey 145). Noah’s serious ways are practiced enormously with his treatment of ladies. As per Noah ladies exist to serve the necessities of God just as himself and his children (Bailey 132). Mrs Noyes, Hannah and Mottyl may have feelings and wants of their own however they should be subjected to the authority of their spouses, fathers and darlings. Noah exhibits his evil treatment of ladies when he murders Japeth’s sibling who is brought into the world a gorilla kid, in spite of Mrs. Noyes’ supplications to allow the infant to live. Noah treats his significant other with considerably more pretentiousness when he concludes that his better half will live beneath the ark and she must choose the option to go. Noah is freezing hearted and will treat his own significant other unpleasantly as long as his humanized fatherly chain of command is all to gether. Plainly, Noah’s legitimate ways are exhibited through his frightful treatment of his significant other. Noah’s energy for power is als...

Case Study about the Jennifer the Consultant

Question: Contextual analysis about the Jennifer the Consultant. Answer: The contextual analysis is about the security framework which the Jennifer needs to create for the customer. This case examined the issues which may emerge because of information uprightness and how morally Jennifer manages the issues. Mr. White Methodology is to be applied by the Jennifer in settling the moral issues and the security issues which her customer organization will look with such a feeble security framework. Break down the outcome Right off the bat Jennifer needs to comprehend the essential morals while planning the database the executives of an organization which requires information honesty and high security of information. The Privacy of data is significant for each expert organization else the information can be abused can hurt the staff and hamper the picture of the organization (ACS set of accepted rules and expert practice proviso 1.2.1 Public interest).As Jennifer has been chipping away at a similar profile for most recent three years with numerous goliath organizations she totally comprehends the significance of intranet and security (Nganga, 2014). It is a convention having a place with the association which no one but representatives can work and the individual approved. (ACS sets of accepted rules and expert practice condition 1.2.2 The Enhancement of Quality of Life.). Investigate the Action The second step in Thomas White strategy is to examine the activity of the Report. She ought to comprehend and needs her choice on the grounds of Ethics, nobility, trustworthiness and regard the protection of each representative working with the association. As she talked about each advancement of database framework with the higher specialists of the organization she is in effect Honest with her work (ACS set of accepted rules and expert practice condition 3 Honesty) (Monga, 2007). As referenced that higher specialists feel that it isn't significant for the framework to be exceptionally secure. Jennifer being exceptionally expert and fair to her work won't need the tied down information to be abused inside or outside the organization .In this circumstance, she needs to take the correct decision of choice, only not for high Authorities yet thinking about each person (Duska, 2000).. The advantage of Report: Jennifer needs to take the correct choice for a since quite a while ago run of the organization she ought to persuade the administration and cause them to see that it is so essential to have a secured information the executives framework. Exactly at the expense of costs they ought not face a challenge with such touchy data. This data may not be significant right now yet in since quite a while ago run purposely or unconsciously spilling of this private information can make a distinction inside the association and can likewise hamper companys image(Spence, 2011).(ACS set of accepted rules and expert practice condition 1.2.6 Professionalism).She can likewise plan a unique framework for the secret information which can be secret word ensured and worked by just a couple of approved staff in the company.(ACS implicit rules and expert practice statement 1.2.5 Professional Development). Outline I have perused the contextual investigation and proposed not many focuses to adapt the issue considering the Ethical problem by Thomas White and from a comprehension of ACS Code of direct and expert statements I have shown up at the recommendation. Jennifer knowing the significance of information the executives framework and organizations the board prerequisite make and endeavor and persuade the administration and build up the framework which stores the classified information. She should fabricate a solid Database the board framework for the organization, wherein representatives won't attempt to get to the information of other just the approved individual liable for the equivalent can cause an entrance this will to likewise assemble a sound workplace inside the association for the since quite a while ago run. References Duska, R. (2000). Business Ethics: Oxymoron or Good Business?.Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), p.111. Monga, M. (2007). A moral dilemma.Monash Business Review, 3(3), pp.34-35. Nganga, J. (2014). The Ethical Dilemma in Globalizing Small Businesses.Journal of Business Systems, Governance Ethics, 7(1). Spence, D. (2011). Morals boards of trustees: a moral dilemma.BMJ, 343(sep21 1), pp.d6002-d6002.

2017 Med School Application Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine

Case Western is located in Cleveland, Ohio with four teaching hospitals in the area and a student run clinic. They are ranked #25 for research and #60 for primary care by U.S. News and World Reports. They accept 155 students each year. Classes are pass/fail in the first two years. Students are placed in one of four advising societies and maintain involvement throughout all four years. They have IQ (inquiry) teams of eight to nine students, that discuss two cases, three times a week with a faculty member. Teamwork is built into the curriculum. It focuses on four themes: research and scholarship, clinical mastery, leadership and civic professionalism. For more information about their curriculum, check out case.edu/medicine/admissions/programs/university-program/curriculum and our podcast interview with Dr. Lina Mehta, Associate Dean for Admissions at Case Western Reserve University College of Medicine. This school is looking for students who are well rounded in all of these areas: scho larship, interpersonal communication skills, leadership, teamwork and community service. 2017 Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Essay Questions: 1. The admissions committee is interested in gaining more insight into you as a person. Please describe a significant personal challenge you have faced, one which you feel has helped to shape you as a person. Examples may include a moral or ethical dilemma, a situation of personal adversity, or a hurdle in your life that you worked hard to overcome. Please include how you got through the experience and what you may have learned about yourself as a result. Please limit your response to 1 page (about 3,500 characters), and leave a blank line between paragraphs. If the 3,500 character recommendation is exceeded, your essay WILL still be saved in its entirety. Given the size of this character limit, you have space for a five paragraph essay. Start by making a list of obstacles that you have overcome. Choose the one that has had the biggest impact on your identity. A one-time event would be a strategic choice if it had long term effects on you and your development. There are many different topics that would work well for this essay, like traveling to a different country, having a unique life experience or making a difficult decision that had major consequences. Introduce the idea in the first paragraph. Give background on the situation or event in the second paragraph. Use the third paragraph to explain â€Å"how you got through the experience.† In the fourth paragraph, you can detail what you learned. In the conclusion, look at the bigger picture. How did the event have an impact on your life, identity and/or career path? 2. University Program Only Essay Optional Scholarly Essay One of the four pillars of the Western Reserve Curriculum is Research and Scholarship. Although research is not a pre-requisite requirement for the University Program, if you have participated in research or in another scholarly project please tell us about it. Describe your experience, including the question you pursued and how you approached it, your results and interpretation of the results, and most importantly, any thoughts about what this experience meant to you. Remember that the definition of research is broadly-based and can include such projects as a senior capstone or a thesis, and can include both medically and non-medically-related investigations. Please limit your response to 1 page (about 3,500 characters), and leave a blank line between paragraphs. If the 3,500 character recommendation is exceeded, your essay WILL still be saved in its entirety. If you have not yet participated in research or scholarly work, please indicate NOT APPLICABLE below in the space provided. Your application will not be viewed unfavorably if you have not participated in scholarly work or research. This prompt also provides the structure for your essay. Another five-paragraph essay will work here, if you are writing about one major research experience. In the introduction, you can explain the basics of the project and your role. In the second paragraph, provide a detailed description of the project and the research question. For the third paragraph, discuss how you â€Å"approached it.† In the fourth, cover the outcomes and any interesting developments in the data for the project. Last, you can use the conclusion to share the overall impact the research had on you. If you have participated in several different research projects, the best way for you to use this space will be to use each paragraph to answer all of these questions about one project at a time. You’ll cover each project, in detail. ***Disclaimer: Information is subject to change. Please check with individual programs to verify the essay questions, instructions and deadlines.*** Case Western Reserve University SOM Application Timeline: If you would like professional guidance with your Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine application materials, check out  Accepted’s Medical School Admissions Consulting and Editing Services, which include advising, editing, and interview coaching for the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine  application materials.  Ã‚   Alicia McNease Nimonkar is an Accepted advisor and editor specializing in healthcare admissions. Prior to joining Accepted, Alicia worked for five years as Student Advisor at UC Davis’ postbac program where she both evaluated applications and advised students applying successfully to med school and related programs.  Want Alicia to help you get accepted? Click here to get in touch! Related Resources: †¢Ã‚  5 Fatal Flaws to Avoid In Your Med School Essays †¢ School-Specific Med Secondary Essay Tips †¢ Interview with Dr. Lina Mehta, Associate Dean for Admissions at Case Western

Theories of Justice - 3826 Words

THEORIES OF JUSTICE INTRODUCTION Justice is action in accordance with the requirements of law. It is suppose to ensure that all members of society receive fair treatment. Issues of justice arise in several different spheres and often play a significant role in causing, enabling, and addressing discord. The goal of the Justice System is to try to resolve and satisfy all these issues for the members of society. Injustice can lead to dissatisfaction, and/or rebellion. The different spheres express the principles of justice and fairness in their own way resulting in different types and concepts of justice. This paper will take a closer look at three justice theories based on our textbook Moral Issues in Business, by William H. Shaw and†¦show more content†¦Does this mean that their decision to vote for Bush was morally right, while those who voted for Kerry was morally wrong? The final question is, were the rights of those who voted for Kerry violated by the will of the majority? Utilitarian theory only states that what is moral is what will bring happiness to the majority. Thus, Utilitarian theory in my view is in direct opposition of individual rights. Libertarian Justice This form of justice promotes liberty, each person living as they please, free from interference of others. Libertarian justice totally rejects utilitarianisms concern for total social well-being. The Libertarian believes that as long as you are not doing something that interferes with anyone elses liberty, then no one including government should disturb you in living the life you choose, regardless of maximizing social happiness. Libertarian justice consists solely out of respect for ones individual liberty. Liberty takes priority over moral concerns. Its obvious from this that a libertarian world, with a complete commitment to individual liberty, would be a much different world then the one we currently live in. (Shaw, Barry, 2004) (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2003) One true libertarian was Robert Nozick a Harvard professor, who began with the premise that people have certain basic moral rights, which he referred to as Lockean Rights taken from political philosopher JohnShow MoreRelatedA Theory Of Justice By Rawls1569 Words   |  7 PagesIn Rawls’ book titled A Theory of Justice, Rawls aims to develop a theory of justice that brings new ideas and concepts to the traditional doctrines of philosophy. Rawls’ theory, justice as fairness, wishes to take the ideas of traditional social contract theories to a higher level of abstraction. His theory is thoroughly explained through a pre-societal position called the original position, the notion of the veil of ignorance, and the two principles of justice. Rawls starts out by describingRead MoreSummary Of A Theory Of Justice 1095 Words   |  5 PagesMurillo Philosophy Applied Ethics Professor Jennings 12/2/14 Rawl’s: A Theory of Justice In our modern society where economic resources are gained by paid labor, there is often room for an unequal distribution of wealth. Hence, a laissez fare or â€Å"hands off† approach to the distribution of such economic resources will often case produce problems and inefficiencies in a society. Rawls says in his writing excerpts, â€Å"A Theory of Justice† from the Ethics in Practice textbook that a state ought to enforceRead MoreRawls Theory Of Justice1598 Words   |  7 Pagesconception of justice that serves the social contract theory more generally and abstractly than such social contract theories provided by Locke, Rousseau, and Kant. In contrast to Locke, Rousseau, and Kant, Rawls’ conception of justice does not provide a specific layout for the intricacies and structure of each social institution. His abstract concept of justness, however, provides the foundation from which a just institution must derive. Within Rawls’ theory of justice, he presents the theory of justiceRead MoreUtilitarianism And Justice Theory1396 Words   |  6 Pages Utilitarianism and Justice Theory Jacob Holman Northern Arizona University July 27, 2017 In the history of philosophy and ethics there have been many great philosophers who have come up with theories to understand if a decision is ethical, what rules should be followed to make ethical decisions, and if the results of decisions determine whether the decision is ethical or not. A comparison of Consequentialist theory and Justice theory will show that each have different methods ofRead MoreQuestions On The Theories Of Justice2659 Words   |  11 PagesIn this chapter, I aim to review and survey Karen Lebacqz’s six theories of Justice. This is essential if, as I will show later, these theories of justice will necessarily be implied in the founding documents and covenants of major social institutions in western civilization. Justice: Utility In its most basic definition, utilitarianism argues, â€Å"The right thing to do is to produce the most good.† According to John Stuart Mill, â€Å"‘utility’ or the ‘greatest happiness principle’ requires that actionsRead More A Theory of Justice Essay3836 Words   |  16 PagesA Theory of Justice Communitarian critics of Rawls have argued that his A Theory of Justice provides an inadequate account of individuals in the original position. Michael Sandel, in Liberalism and the Limits of Justice argues that Rawls conception of the person divorces any constitutive attachments that persons might have to their ends. Hence, Sandel asserts that Rawls privileges the standpoint of self-interested individuals at the expense of communal interests. I do not find Sandels specificRead MoreRawls Theory Of Justice1905 Words   |  8 Pages Rawls Theory of Justice Ming Chi Wang 36979110 University of British Columbia John Rawls in his work, â€Å"A Theory of Justice,† aims to make up a theory that will rivals intuitionalists and utilitarianism, which seeks truth in morality that cause results in maximizing utility for the maximum number of people. Rawls’ theory of justice is a distribution theory that maximizes primary goods for the worst outcome an individual could be in. By primary goodsRead MoreA Theory Of Justice By Rawls1317 Words   |  6 PagesIn his book ‘A Theory of Justice’, Rawls was dissatisfied with the traditional philosophical arguments about what makes a social institution just and about what justifies political or social actions and policies. The utilitarian argument holds that societies should pursue the greatest good for the greatest number. This argument has a number of problems, including, especially, that it seems to be consistent with the idea of the tyranny of majorities over minorities. The intuitionist argument holdsRead MoreRawls Theory of J ustice1853 Words   |  8 PagesThe conventional accounts of Justice normally begin by stating a fundamental rule of Aristotle – Justice is to treat equals equally and unequals unequally, and that unequal treatment should be in proportion to the inequality. In everyday life though, justice is seen as an attribute of law, while all laws are not necessarily just. Many great socio- political movements of the world have focused from time to time on unjust laws eg Apartheid laws in South Africa and Caste laws in India. ImpartialityRead MoreA Theory Of Justice By John Rawls Essay909 Words   |  4 Pagesindividuals behind a veil of ignorance would assent to the two primary principles of justice found in Rawls’ ‘A theory of justice’. I will also analyse the extract, in particular debating whether various propositions made by Rawls in this extract are true. Initially it is important to situate the extract of discussion. Section 3 of ‘A theory of justice’ is the opening of Rawls’ argument in ‘A theory of justice’, where he introduces his ‘original position’, stating how rational individuals in a hypothetical

Separation of Power free essay sample

In this essay I shall attempt to analyse whether the separation of powers is respected in the attribution of competences within the European Union. The separation of powers In order to assess this question we first have to consider what the doctrine of separation of powers actually is. The idea was developed by the French jurist Montesquieu in the 18th Century. It is based on a division of power between the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. Each institution have their distinct and largely exclusive domain. The legislative function involves the enactment of general rules determining the structure and powers of public authorities and regulating the conduct of citizens and private organisations. The executive’s main function is to carry out the law. It initiates legislation, maintains order, promotes social and economic welfare, administrates public services and conducts external relations of the state among other things. The primary judicial function is to determine disputed questions of fact and law in accordance with the law laid down by the legislature. The concept of â€Å"separation† may mean at least three different things: (i)that the same persons should not form part of more than one of the three organs of government, e. g. , that ministers should not sit in Parliament; (ii)that one organ of government should not control or interfere in judicial decisions; (iii)that one organ of government should not exercise the functions of another, e. g. , that ministers should not have legislative powers. The reason why there should be a separation of powers is so that each distinct institution can carry out its function independently and check the other two – a form of checks and balances. The doctrine is opposed to the concentration of state power in a single person or group, since that is a clear threat to democratic government and in the same sense it is important that the legislature is not only a rubber stamp for the executive. Even an independent judiciary is necessary if the rule of law is to have any substance. It is in the US’ constitution that this doctrine can best be seen. How then does the division of power look like within the European Union? The ain institutions within the Union are the Council of the EU (also known as the Council of Ministers), the European Commission, the European Parliament (the EP) and the European Court of Justice (the ECJ). In deep contrast to the doctrine of separation of powers, there is no independent legislature or executive within the EU. Almost all of the institutions are interrelated and there is no clear separation of competences. Only the judiciary (the ECJ) is more or less separated from the other institutions rega rding its judiciary powers. The Legislature In the EU, the legislative power is shared between the Council of EU and the European Parliament. The Council is the EU’s main decision-making institution and final legislative authority. However, it shares competence with the EP in respect to the legislative power. For a wide range of Community issues it exercises its legislative power in co-decision with the Parliament. The role of the Council as the main decision-making institution in the EU is defined in terms of three pillars set out in the Treaty of Maastricht. The first pillar covers a wide range of policies such as agriculture, environment, transport, energy and development. The Council may either adopt, amend or ignore the proposed law. However, a wide range of legislation is subject to a co-decision procedure. Depending on the individual legal basis, the EP takes part, to varying degrees, in the drafting of Community legislation. The role of the EP as co-legislator applies to a wide range of issues 39 legal bases in the EC Treaty. The co-decision procedure means that legislation has to be adopted by both the Council and the Parliament. This is a clear example of the mixture of competences that exists within the EU. For the two other pillars the Council is the sole decision-maker. Instead there is a consultation procedure, which requires consultation from the EP before the Council can adopt a legislative proposal. The Council is not required to accept the amendments listed in the opinion of the EP. The Council and the Parliament also constitute the budgetary authority adopting the Community’s budget and overseeing its implementation. The Executive Executive power in the EU is shared between the European Commission and the Council of EU. The Commission plays a major role in the EU’s policy-making process as EU laws are mainly enforced by Commission action. One of the distinct functions of the Commission is initiating proposals for legislation. The Commission is the main institution preparing proposals. However, concerning common foreign and security policy and co-operation on justice and home affairs, the Council is the promoter of initiatives and also the institution implementing the policies. But the Commission may submit a proposal. The Commission has also the budgetary initiative, drawing up the preliminary draft budget, which is put to the Council. Even the Parliament has a right of initiative. It has the possibility of asking the Commission to put forward a proposal and it is also involved in the budgetary procedure from the preparation stage, particularly in laying down the general guidelines and the type of spending. This is completely against the doctrine of separation of powers. Within this principle it is unthinkable that the same institution that is legislating is also the same body drafting the proposals for legislation. The Commission is also a negotiator of international trade and co-operation agreements with third countries, or groups of countries, which are put to the Council for conclusion. In an ordinary legal system, both the negotiating and the concluding of international agreements would be made by the executive, which would then have to be presented to the legislature. In the EU, in some cases, the Council cannot even conclude the agreements by itself, but has to consult the Parliament or even have its assent before being able to do so. The Judiciary The only function that has remained more or less distinct within the EU is the judicial function. The judiciary comprises of the European Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance. The Court of Justice is responsible for enhancing the effectiveness of EU law and integration. Its two main functions are to directly apply the law and a general responsibility for interpreting the provisions of the European Treaty. However, even here there is to some extent a mixture of power. The reason for this lies with the Commission, which is quasi-judicial. Under certain circumstances, the Commission can fine individuals, firms and organisations for infringing Treaty law. But its decisions can be appealed. The ECJ can be consulted by the Member States and enterprises when they want to appeal against fines imposed by the Commission. Checks and balances Even though the system of the institutions of the EU is not compatible with the doctrine of the separation of powers the most important function of the doctrine still exists – institutional balance. Despite the mixture of the allocation of powers, there still remains a form of â€Å"checks and balances†. Commission proposals, actions and decisions are in various ways scrutinised, checked and judged by the other institutions. For instance, the Commission is answerable to the EP, which has the power to dismiss it by vote of censure or no confidence. The Commission attends all the sessions of the EP and must explain and justify its policies if so requested by members of the house and it must reply to written or oral questions put by the MEPs. The Commission’s management of the EU budget is also scrutinised by the Court of Auditors which is responsible for examining the legality and regularity of revenue and expenditure and for ensuring the sound financial management of the EU budget. On the basis of the Court of Auditors’ reports, it is the EP which gives the final discharge for the execution of the annual budget. The EP also exercises control over the Council; its representatives appearing regularly before the Parliament. Conclusion It can clearly be seen that the doctrine of separation of powers is not respected in the attribution of competences within the EU. However, complete separation of powers is possible neither in theory nor in practice, if by this is meant that each function is exercised in isolation from the others. Even in the US there is no complete separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial functions. In fact, even Montesquieu did not mean that legislature and executive should not have any influence over the acts of each other, but only that neither should exercise the whole power of the other. Instead it can be argued that what is more important is that there is an elaborate system of checks and balances to enable control and influence to be exercised by each branch upon the others. The best example of this is the UK, where there is no clear separation of powers, but where we instead have a developed form of checks and balances to ensure that no arbitrary decisions are taken. Although it can be argued whether the checks and balances that exist in the EU is as effective and elaborate as the ones in the US and the UK. In conclusion, the separation of powers is not respected in the attribution of competences within the EU. However, the lack of a clear, threefold allocation of functions is not necessary as long as there is an effective form of checks and balances.

Personal Story Essay Samples on Reddit

Personal Story Essay Samples on RedditSome of the best Personal Story Essay samples on Reddit are really funny, some are really sad and some are just both. I hope you enjoy them as much as I do and maybe they will inspire you to write a personal story that you might not have even thought about before.Well, I think I'm done, sorry for the long winded response, but here is my recommendation. You can simply bookmark this article or you can read the following story on Reddit.This is about a guy who was told at his High School that he was 'too' good for the real world. What it meant was that he didn't think of himself as good, just the way he was. He never asked questions about why his grades weren't that great and he didn't want to make his parents unhappy. In his junior year he decided to 'go out on a limb'.Now to put this in a personal story format, it was around this time when he first got into trouble with the law because he stole a bunch of money from his parent's home in high schoo l. And now he's trying to figure out what he did to deserve his parent's anger because they basically told him he's not good enough.I believe this is a story that can be told in a personal account essay but it won't necessarily show up with the 'just in case' heading. It seems that some people have difficulty reconciling what really is important and what is normal in the real world. Their story also shows that sometimes it's not what you think that matters and it might be the other way around.Another personal story on this list is a short one that was submitted by 'Tihena', who is an entertainer and also works as a travel agent. She wrote about her struggle with depression and her decision to finally quit drinking and take the steps that she had been afraid to take.This one is a personal story on a more serious note than the rest. A few years ago, two of her best friends died in a car accident. She needed to get help but the only option was to go through inpatient drug rehab treatme nt, something she knew nothing about, so she decided to do research and finally realized how well her life would have been different if her friends hadn't died.If you think about all of these Personal Story Essay samples on Reddit, it makes sense that you could use them as an essay topic if you're in need of a little inspiration. These are just a few, so I encourage you to look around and see what other examples you can find.

Abstract Research Paper Example - How to Use Them to Describe Your Ideas

Abstract Research Paper Example - How to Use Them to Describe Your IdeasOne of the more important aspects of writing a research paper is knowing how to use an abstract research paper example. The best ones are more than simply lists of items, or technical details that need to be translated into meaningful words. They're an effective way to demonstrate how your examples can be used to organize, condense, and break up a big list of problems.There are a lot of uses for an abstract research paper example. They're best used as a guide to how you can work through a large body of work or idea and help you do so effectively. Most students find them a great place to find inspiration from.An abstract research paper example is especially useful for students in their first year or even a sophomore. They know very little about scientific concepts and are likely to struggle with them. They are also likely to have trouble finding information on the web, so they are more likely to rely on abstract r esearch paper examples. That is, if they're not used to getting papers without specific information on how to do them.When you're trying to make a good impression on a class, an abstract research paper example will show them exactly what to expect, in an organized, easy to read format. You won't have to go through all of their reading list, they won't have to learn new grammar or spelling, and they'll get some ideas for the paper and just as importantly, you'll be able to demonstrate to them how you use different examples to make them more readable.Abstract research paper examples are also a good way to get your idea across. Often times, a student will come to class thinking they know enough to write a paper, but is confused by how you use each of your examples. Allowing them to use one example as a 'reference' and then go through the paper individually will allow them to understand more about the entire idea. They'll be able to see that there is more to the idea than just a single example.A unique way to use an abstract research paper example is as a guide to how you can break down the work you've done to get it. For example, if you had a hard time putting a large study into words, how would you rephrase it so that it would look much more organized?An abstract research paper example is a quick and easy way to demonstrate how to use your ideas to condense them and break them up. Using one example lets you break the hard work into smaller steps, giving you an easy way to show your students how you were able to turn your ideas into a useful piece of writing.